Annual PM2.5 regulation enforced in four northern provinces by court order

Annual PM2.5 regulation enforced in four northern provinces by court order

The Supreme Administrative Court of Thailand has made a historic decision on August 1, 2025, mandating the National Environmental Board to officially declare Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Lamphun, and Mae Hong Son provinces as designated PM2.5 pollution control zones. This order comes in response to years of persistent pollution that has caused significant harm to public health and quality of life in these regions.

The ruling, effective from February to May each year, requires the National Environmental Board to implement and enforce annual measures to control PM2.5 pollution under the framework of Thailand's National Environmental Quality Promotion and Preservation Act of 1992. The decision signifies a shift towards stricter regulatory oversight in these provinces, with the aim of reducing harmful PM2.5 levels.

The court's thorough examination revealed that despite the National Environmental Board's efforts under the national agenda "Dust Pollution Mitigation" since 2020, the levels of PM2.5 in the four provinces from 2018 to 2021 remained above the standard levels between February and May. This ongoing pollution has led to a significant increase in cases of heart disease, respiratory disorders, eye infections, and skin inflammations, all linked to the rise in PM2.5 levels.

The ongoing pollution poses a significant health threat to local residents, prompting Phumi Watchara Charoenphalitpol, a resident of Hang Dong district, Chiang Mai, to file a lawsuit against the National Environmental Board for failing to address the recurring PM2.5 pollution from forest fires and burning activities in northern Thailand. The case has now led to this landmark ruling.

While no detailed operational steps or timelines beyond the declaration have been reported yet, the legal ruling sets a clear priority and legal obligation for enhanced pollution control in these regions. The ruling also requires the implementation of this measure within 90 days from the final judgment.

This decision marks a significant step towards improving air quality and public health in the affected provinces. As more details emerge, it is hoped that concrete actions will be taken to address the serious air quality problems caused by PM2.5.

[1] National Environmental Quality Promotion and Preservation Act of 1992 [2] Dust Pollution Mitigation national agenda [3] Supreme Administrative Court ruling on August 1, 2025

1. The new ruling by the Supreme Administrative Court mandates Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Lamphun, and Mae Hong Son provinces as designated PM2.5 pollution control zones.
2. This historic decision comes after years of persistent pollution that has caused significant harm to public health and quality of life in these regions.
3. The ruling, effective from February to May each year, requires the National Environmental Board to implement annual measures to control PM2.5 pollution.
4. The National Environmental Board's efforts under the national agenda "Dust Pollution Mitigation" since 2020 have not been adequate, as the levels of PM2.5 in the four provinces from 2018 to 2021 remained above the standard levels between February and May.
5. The ongoing pollution has led to a significant increase in cases of heart disease, respiratory disorders, eye infections, and skin inflammations, all linked to the rise in PM2.5 levels.
6. The court's ruling signifies a shift towards stricter regulatory oversight in these provinces, with the aim of reducing harmful PM2.5 levels.
7. Phumi Watchara Charoenphalitpol, a resident of Hang Dong district, Chiang Mai, filed a lawsuit against the National Environmental Board for failing to address the recurring PM2.5 pollution.
8. The Supreme Administrative Court ruling on August 1, 2025, is a response to this claim.
9. The ruling sets a clear priority and legal obligation for enhanced pollution control in these regions.
10. The implementation of this measure is required within 90 days from the final judgment.
11. Improving air quality and public health in the affected provinces is the primary goal of this decision.
12. The ruling underscores the urgent need for environmentally friendly practices in these regions to address the serious air quality problems caused by PM2.5.
13. The National Environmental Board will face legal consequences if they fail to address the recurring PM2.5 pollution.
14. This ruling demonstrates the importance of environmental protection in the economy, tourism, and overall public welfare.
15. The decision also reveals the impact of environmental degradation on businesses, such as tourism, which heavily rely on a clean and healthy environment.
16. The increased pollution has a ripple effect on various sectors, including healthcare, medical-conditions, chronic-diseases, cancer, respiratory-conditions, digestive-health, and eye-health.
17. Each year, the surge in medical cases related to PM2.5 pollution places a significant burden on healthcare and public spending.
18. The ruling offers a potential solution with the implementation of annual measures to control PM2.5 pollution.
19. Health-and-wellness, fitness-and-exercise, and workplace-wellness will significantly benefit from cleaner air and reduced healthcare costs.
20. The ruling also has implications for the manufacturing sector, which must adapt its practices to comply with the new regulations on air quality.
21. Skin-care industry may also witness a growth in demand due to the rise in skin conditions caused by PM2.5 pollution.
22. Mental-health and neurological-disorders may also be linked to long-term exposure to PM2.5 pollution.
23. Therapies-and-treatments, including respiratory, cardiovascular, and nutritional therapies, will be crucial in helping patients recover from PM2.5-related diseases.
24. Climate change and energy consumption are indirect factors that contribute to the rise in PM2.5 levels, as deforestation leads to increased burning activities.
25. The ruling serves as an example for other countries facing similar issues with PM2.5 pollution control.
26. The decision emphasizes the importance of environmental science, finance, and policy in addressing major environmental issues like this one.
27. The ruling instills a sense of urgency in the public for action against climate change and environmental degradation.
28. Everyday actions, like investing in clean energy and sustainable living, contribute to reducing PM2.5 levels.
29. Lifestyle choices such as outdoor living, gardening, and sustainable-living are becoming increasingly important in promoting public health and well-being.
30. Fashion-and-beauty, food-and-drink, and personal-finance industries must also adapt their practices to align with environmentally friendly values.
31. This ruling highlights the interconnectedness of various sectors and the necessary steps towards a cleaner, healthier, and more sustainable future for everyone.

Read also: